When considering breast augmentation, one of the crucial decisions you have to make is choosing the right implant profile. The profile refers to the level of projection of the implant from the chest wall. In this article, we will provide a professional analysis of high profile and moderate profile breast implants, considering various factors that can help you make an informed decision.
1. Definition and Appearance
High profile implants have a narrow base and greater projection, resulting in a more prominent and perky appearance. On the other hand, moderate profile implants have a wider base and provide a more natural-looking contour.
2. Projection Options: Options in high profile implants provide a choice for a more extreme projection, suitable for individuals seeking a more noticeable increase in breast size.
3. Desired Cup Size and Body Proportions: High profile implants are typically recommended for patients who seek a significant increase in cup size relative to their frame, while moderate profile implants are more suitable for individuals looking for a moderate size enhancement in proportion to their body.
4. Body Type: High profile implants may be a better choice for individuals with smaller frames or narrower chests, as they can provide the desired volume without significantly widening the chest.
5. Cleavage: High profile implants tend to deliver a more impressive cleavage due to their projection, compared to moderate profile implants.
6. Rippling: With a narrower base, high profile implants are less likely to show rippling or wrinkling on the surface.
7. Price and Availability: The cost of breast implants varies across the United States, but generally, high profile implants are slightly more expensive than moderate profile implants.
8. Surgical Incision: The choice of implant profile may influence the type of incision used for the surgery. High profile implants may require a longer incision due to their projection.
9. Durable and Longevity: High profile implants tend to have a thicker shell, which can make them more durable and less prone to rupture or leakage over time.
10. Rotation and Movement: High profile implants offer less movement and rotation due to their narrower base, providing a more stable result.
11. Breast Implant Placement: While both high and moderate profile implants can be placed under the breast (submammary placement), high profile implants are more commonly used when considering submuscular placement.
12. Revision Surgery: Choosing high profile implants might reduce the need for revision surgery for patients who desire a more significant breast size increase.
13. Lifestyle Factors: Some patients with an active lifestyle or engage in fitness activities may prefer high profile implants due to the reduced interference with arm movement.
14. Patient Satisfaction: Numerous studies have shown high patient satisfaction rates with both high and moderate profile implants. The right choice depends on personal aesthetic preferences.
15. Consultation with Plastic Surgeon: Ultimately, consulting with a qualified plastic surgeon is crucial to determine the most appropriate implant profile based on individual needs and goals.
Conclusion
Choosing between high profile and moderate profile implants is a decision that should be made thoughtfully and with appropriate professional guidance. Your plastic surgeon can provide valuable insights based on your unique body proportions, lifestyle, and desired outcome. Remember, the choice of implant profile should be aligned with your aesthetic goals, resulting in a natural-looking and satisfying final result.
References:
1. Adams, W. P., & Small, K. H. (2021). Mentor moderate plus profile saline-filled breast implants. Aesthetic Surgery Journal, 41(6), NP386-NP395.
2. Rogers, N., Deng, C., & Newen, A. (2020). High Profile, Moderate Plus Profile, and Anatomical Gummy Bear Breast Implants: A Comparative Evaluation Using 3D Imaging. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 1-8.
3. Wong, C., Samargandi, O. A., & Woodbyrne, A. (2019). Impact of implant profile selection on outcomes after primary submuscular breast augmentation. Clinical Plastic Surgery, 46(3), 327-334.
