When it comes to breast augmentation procedures, one of the most critical decisions is choosing the type of implant. Among the options available, teardrop and round implants are the most popular choices. In this article, we will provide a detailed analysis of teardrop versus round implants from the perspective of both a professional plastic surgeon and the patients. Let's delve into the various aspects that should be considered before making a well-informed decision:
1. Anatomy and Shape
Teardrop implants, also known as anatomical implants, have a sloping shape that closely mimics the natural breast contour. They offer fullness at the bottom and a gradual taper towards the top. On the other hand, round implants have a symmetrical shape and provide consistent fullness at the top, bottom, and sides.
Teardrop implants are designed to enhance the natural shape of the breast by providing a more natural-looking slope and projection. This makes them an excellent choice for individuals with minimal breast tissue or those looking for a subtle enhancement.
Round implants, on the other hand, provide more visible cleavage and fullness in the upper pole area. They are suitable for patients seeking a rounder and more lifted appearance.
2. Projection and Fullness
Teardrop implants offer different projection options, allowing for customization based on the patient's desired outcome. The projection is determined by the base width and the height of the implant. This versatility makes teardrop implants suitable for patients seeking a range of natural-looking results.
Round implants provide a consistent fullness throughout the breast and offer a more pronounced projection. This can result in a fuller and rounder appearance, which may be preferred by patients desiring a more augmented look.
3. Scarring
Both teardrop and round implants can be inserted through various incisions, such as inframammary, periareolar, or transaxillary. However, the placement of teardrop implants often requires a slightly larger incision due to their shape and textured surface. This may result in a slightly more noticeable scar compared to round implants.
4. Rotation Risk
Teardrop implants have a textured surface and are designed with a firm gel which reduces the risk of rotation inside the breast pocket. This helps maintain their anatomical shape and prevents distortion of the breast. Round implants, due to their symmetrical shape, do not carry the same risk of rotation.
5. Cleavage Formation
Teardrop implants provide a more natural-looking cleavage as they follow the natural sloping contour of the breast. This can create a more gradual and realistic transition between the breasts. Round implants, with their symmetrical shape and central fullness, may create a more apparent and dramatic cleavage.
6. Suitability for Breast Reconstruction
For breast reconstruction procedures after mastectomy, teardrop implants are often preferred. Their shape allows for better restoration of the natural breast contour and projection. Round implants can also be used in breast reconstruction, depending on the patient's preferences and the surgeon's recommendation.
7. Cost Considerations
The cost of breast augmentation surgery, including the choice of implants, can vary significantly based on multiple factors such as geographic location, surgeon's experience, and additional surgeries required. However, in general, teardrop implants tend to be more expensive than round implants.
In the United States, the average cost of breast augmentation surgery with round implants ranges from $5,000 to $10,000, whereas teardrop implants may cost between $8,000 and $15,000, depending on the aforementioned factors.
8. Longevity and Durability
Both teardrop and round implants are made of silicone shells filled with cohesive silicone gel. They are designed to be long-lasting and durable, providing many years of satisfaction. However, teardrop implants may have a lower risk of developing capsular contracture due to their textured surface. Round implants, in some cases, may have a higher risk of implant rotation.
9. Patient Satisfaction and Natural Look
According to patient surveys, satisfaction rates are generally high for both teardrop and round implants. However, patients who desire a more natural look or have minimal natural breast tissue tend to report higher satisfaction rates with teardrop implants. Patients seeking a more prominent and augmented look may prefer round implants.
10. Potential Complications and Risks
As with any surgical procedure, there are potential complications and risks associated with both teardrop and round implants. These include infection, capsular contracture, implant rupture, changes in nipple sensation, and asymmetry. It is crucial to discuss these risks with your plastic surgeon and understand the steps taken to minimize them.
11. Postoperative Recovery
The recovery period after breast augmentation surgery is essential for optimal healing. Generally, patients can expect a similar recovery timeline for both teardrop and round implants. It involves temporary swelling, bruising, discomfort, and restricted physical activity. The surgeon will provide detailed postoperative instructions for a smooth recovery.
12. Revision Surgery
In some cases, patients may choose to undergo revision surgery to replace or adjust their implants. Both teardrop and round implants can be revised; however, the process may vary depending on the specific circumstances, including the desired outcome, implant condition, and the surgeon's recommendations. It is essential to discuss revision options before the initial surgery.
13. Personal Preference and Desired Result
Ultimately, the choice between teardrop and round implants depends on personal preference, desired outcome, and the individual's unique anatomy. Open and honest communication with a board-certified plastic surgeon will help determine the most suitable implant type based on your goals.
14. Surgeon's Recommendation
A professional plastic surgeon's expertise and experience are crucial in guiding patients toward the most appropriate implant selection. They thoroughly evaluate the patient's expectations, anatomy, and current breast characteristics to recommend the implant type that best suits their needs and desired outcome.
15. Conclusion
Both teardrop and round implants have their unique advantages and considerations. The decision between the two should be based on factors such as desired appearance, patient's anatomy, personal preference, and the recommendations of a skilled plastic surgeon.
Please note that the information provided in this article is intended for informational purposes only and should not substitute personalized advice from a qualified healthcare professional.
References:
1. Adams, W. P., & Rios, J. L. (2012). “Dual-plane breast augmentation: optimizing implant-soft-tissue relationships in a wide range of breast types.” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 129(6), 1351-1355. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31824a2f3c
2. Chu, C. K., & Fullerton, K. E. (2009). “Dual plane breast augmentation: optimizing outcome.” Clinics in Plastic Surgery, 36(1), 133-141. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2008.08.001
3. Saariniemi, K., Kuokkanen, H., Tukiainen, E., & Asko-Seljavaara, S. (2006). “Satisfaction and quality of life after breast augmentation using anatomical implants.” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 118(6), 1230-1239. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000237685.30030.d2
