Introduction
Breast augmentation has become a highly sought - after cosmetic procedure in New York City. There are various techniques and prostheses available, with ES breast augmentation prosthesis being one of the options that women consider. In this article, we will delve into the top five evaluations of ES breast augmentation prosthesis in New York City, taking into account different techniques used by renowned plastic surgeons.
Overview of Breast Augmentation in New York City
New York City is a hub for cosmetic surgery, housing some of the most experienced and well - qualified plastic surgeons in the world. Breast augmentation, specifically, has been on the rise, driven by women's desire to enhance their appearance, boost self - confidence, and achieve better body proportions.
There are multiple types of breast augmentation techniques, including using different types of implants (silicone, saline, etc.) and fat transfer methods. The choice of technique and prosthesis depends on a patient's individual goals, body type, and the advice of their plastic surgeon.
Top Plastic Surgeons in New York City for Breast Augmentation
Dr. Adam R. Kolker
Dr. Adam R. Kolker is a double - board certified plastic surgeon in New York City. His education and training span some of the most prestigious medical institutions in the world, including Harvard Medical School, New York University, and the University of Melbourne in Australia. He is an associate clinical professor of surgery at the Mount Sinai School of Medicine.
In breast augmentation, Dr. Kolker focuses on true artistry, emphasizing that "beautiful" should be more important than "size." He tailors each breast augmentation to a woman's aesthetic goals based on her body type, aiming for proportionate and natural results. His extensive credentials, such as being featured in New York Magazine's Best Doctors issues from 2008 - 2024, America's Best Plastic Surgeons by Newsweek in 2021 - 2024, and Castle Connolly's Top Doctors, add to his credibility.
Patient testimonials rave about his ability to achieve incredible results. For example, one patient said, “I could not believe my eyes. Dr. Kolker had done something all other surgeons had told me was not possible. He made the impossible, possible i could not believe it took a possibility and turned it into my reality! I will forever be thankful to him for correcting my asymmetrical breasts and making me so happy.”
Dr. Darrick Antell
Dr. Darrick Antell is a board - certified plastic and reconstructive surgeon. Trained at Stanford and Cornell, he has performed more than ten thousand plastic surgery procedures, including thousands of breast augmentation surgeries. He is among the most respected breast augmentation surgeons in the country and has been listed in multiple magazines like Harper’s Bazaar and Town and Country as one of the best breast plastic surgeons.
Dr. Antell addresses common complications like capsular contracture and offers a comprehensive consultation process. He helps patients understand different types of implants (silicone gel and saline), implant placement (subglandular or submuscular), and sizing. His expertise ensures that patients achieve enhanced confidence, improved proportions, customized volume and shape, and rejuvenated appearance through breast augmentation.
Patient reviews highlight his excellent care and results. One patient stated, “I received all the attention from Dr. Antell and his friendly staff. I am very happy with the results. It's been less than 2 weeks since the surgery, I feel very satisfied.”
Mount Sinai Plastic Surgeons
The plastic surgeons at Mount Sinai have extensive experience in performing breast augmentation. They use advanced 3D imaging technology to help patients visualize how their larger breasts will look on their unique bodies. This technology allows patients to virtually try on different sizes of breasts before making a decision.
There are two types of implants available: silicone breast implants, which look and feel natural, and saline breast implants, which are firmer and rounder. Additionally, they offer a non - implant option called NaturalFill®, a fat transfer technique. This involves removing fat from the buttocks or abdomen via liposuction and inserting it into the breasts. The surgeons at Mount Sinai help patients choose the best option based on their body type and desired outcome.
Dr. Rapaport
Dr. Rapaport, trained at Harvard and New York University, has over 25 years of experience in the field. He is one of only 250 doctors nationwide offering the Ideal Implant. The Ideal Implant has several advantages, including low rates of capsular contracture and rupture, facilitating more minute incisions, being an FDA - approved, saline - filled dual - chamber device made from FDA - tested saline, and being hypoallergenic.
It also allows patients to detect malfunctions by simply looking in the mirror, eliminating the need for MRIs to diagnose rupture. Dr. Rapaport provides an in - depth and confidential consultation process. He examines the patient's breasts, records their medical history, and helps them evaluate their goals for augmentation using advanced 3D imaging and by allowing patients to hold actual implants.
Dr. John E. Sherman
Dr. John E. Sherman is an experienced and acclaimed plastic surgeon. He has a deep understanding of breast implants, including the advancements over the years. For example, he was involved in the original development of the Natrelle 410 cohesive gel breast implants. These FDA - approved devices have an anatomically shaped silhouette that closely resembles the curve of a woman's breast.
When it comes to choosing breast implants, Dr. Sherman guides patients through considerations such as material (saline or silicone), shape (round or anatomical), size, and texture. He tailors the breast augmentation procedure to each patient's unique needs and desires, helping them achieve their ideal breast profile. His commitment to patient care and excellent results is evident in his personalized approach.
Evaluations of ES Breast Augmentation Prosthesis
Evaluation 1: Safety and Reliability
One of the primary concerns when considering ES breast augmentation prosthesis is safety. The ES prosthesis, like other breast implants, must undergo rigorous testing and meet strict safety standards. Many of the top plastic surgeons in New York City only use FDA - approved prostheses to ensure the well - being of their patients.
For example, Dr. Antell, who uses a variety of breast implants, emphasizes the importance of safety. His patients can trust that any ES prosthesis he uses would adhere to high - quality safety protocols. In the case of potential complications such as capsular contracture or rupture, a reliable ES prosthesis should have a low incidence rate. Plastic surgeons need to thoroughly discuss these risks with patients during the consultation process, ensuring that patients are well - informed.
Studies and long - term data on ES breast augmentation prosthesis would also contribute to its evaluation in terms of safety and reliability. Surgeons rely on this information to make informed decisions when recommending the prosthesis to their patients.
Evaluation 2: Aesthetic Results
Aesthetic results are a key factor in breast augmentation. The ES breast augmentation prosthesis should be able to provide natural - looking and proportionate results. Plastic surgeons, like Dr. Kolker, with their artistic eye, focus on creating a beautiful breast shape that complements a patient's body type.
ES prosthesis comes in different shapes (round or anatomical) and sizes. Round implants can add volume higher on the chest, while anatomical implants are teardrop - shaped to replicate the form of natural breasts. The choice of shape depends on the patient's goals and body anatomy. The texture of the ES prosthesis also plays a role in aesthetic results. A textured surface can help the prosthesis adhere better to the surrounding tissue, reducing the risk of rotation and displacement, which could affect the overall appearance.
Surgeons use advanced techniques and 3D imaging technology to help patients visualize the potential aesthetic results of using ES breast augmentation prosthesis. This allows patients to have a clearer idea of what they can expect and make more informed decisions.
Evaluation 3: Patient Comfort
Patient comfort during and after the breast augmentation procedure is crucial. The ES breast augmentation prosthesis should be designed in a way that minimizes discomfort. During the surgery, the surgeon's choice of incision location and placement of the prosthesis can impact the patient's comfort level.
For instance, Dr. Sherman offers different incision options such as inframammary, periareolar, or transaxillary incisions. The choice of incision depends on the type of ES prosthesis and the patient's body anatomy. The placement of the prosthesis, either subglandular or submuscular, also affects post - operative comfort. Submuscular placement may result in a longer recovery time but can provide a more natural look and potentially less discomfort in the long run.
After the surgery, patients should be able to resume their normal activities as soon as possible. The ES prosthesis should not cause excessive pain, tightness, or other discomforts that would impede the patient's daily life. Surgeons provide pain management plans and post - operative care instructions to ensure patient comfort during the recovery period.
Evaluation 4: Long - Term Durability
Breast implants are not designed to last a lifetime, but long - term durability is an important consideration. The ES breast augmentation prosthesis should withstand normal wear and tear, as well as the body's natural movements. Silicone and saline ES prostheses have different characteristics in terms of durability.
Silicone ES prostheses are known for their ability to mimic the texture and feel of natural breast tissue. They are less likely to ripple and may provide a more natural look. However, in case of rupture, it may be more difficult to detect. Saline ES prostheses, on the other hand, are filled with salt water. If a rupture occurs, the body can safely absorb the saline, and the rupture is more easily detectable as the breast will deflate.
Surgeons like Dr. Rapaport, who offers the Ideal Implant, understand the importance of durability. His patients can be assured that the prosthesis he uses has undergone extensive testing to ensure a reasonable lifespan. Regular check - ups are also recommended to monitor the condition of the ES breast augmentation prosthesis over time.
Evaluation 5: Compatibility with Different Techniques
The ES breast augmentation prosthesis should be compatible with different breast augmentation techniques. There are various surgical approaches, such as using different incision locations and implant placement methods. For example, Dr. Cangello offers different options for implant placement (submuscular or subglandular) and incision locations (periareolar, inframammary, or transaxillary, with the transaxillary technique avoided due to a higher rate of implant malposition).
The ES prosthesis should be suitable for these different techniques. It should be able to be inserted through different incisions without causing excessive trauma to the surrounding tissue. Also, its shape and size should be compatible with the chosen placement method to achieve the desired aesthetic and functional results. Plastic surgeons need to have in - depth knowledge of the ES prosthesis and how it can be used in combination with different techniques to provide the best possible outcome for their patients.
Different Techniques Used in ES Breast Augmentation
Incision Techniques
- Inframammary Incision: This incision is made under the breast, in the crease where the breast meets the chest. It provides good access to the breast pocket for inserting the ES prosthesis. Surgeons can accurately place the implant, and the scar is usually well - hidden. Many surgeons, including Dr. Sherman, use this technique as it allows for easy adjustment of the implant position during surgery.
- Periareolar Incision: Made around the areola, this incision can result in minimal visible scarring as the scar blends with the natural pigmentation of the areola. However, it may have a slightly higher risk of affecting nipple sensation. Surgeons carefully select patients who are suitable for this incision technique to balance the aesthetic and functional aspects.
- Transaxillary Incision: This incision is made in the armpit. It allows for a more discreet scar, but it can be more challenging to achieve precise implant placement. Some surgeons, like Dr. Cangello, avoid this technique due to the higher risk of implant malposition.
Implant Placement Techniques
- Subglandular Placement: The ES prosthesis is placed above the pectoral muscle, behind the breast tissue. This technique is more straightforward and has a shorter recovery time. However, the implants may look and feel less natural, especially in patients with little natural breast tissue. Athletes or patients with a lot of muscle activity may benefit from this placement as it allows for more movement without excessive discomfort.
- Submuscular Placement: The prosthesis is placed under the pectoral muscle. It provides a more natural look and reduces the risk of visible rippling. However, it may cause more pain during the recovery period and requires a longer time for the implants to settle. Surgeons often recommend this placement for patients who want a more natural appearance and are willing to tolerate a longer recovery process.
Comparative Table of Plastic Surgeons and Their Approaches to ES Breast Augmentation
| Plastic Surgeon | Key Features of Approach | Preferred Techniques | Notable Achievements |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Adam R. Kolker | Focus on artistry, custom - tailoring to patient's body type for natural and proportionate results | Various incision and placement techniques based on patient needs | Featured in New York Magazine's Best Doctors, America's Best Plastic Surgeons by Newsweek |
| Dr. Darrick Antell | Comprehensive consultation, addressing common complications, offering multiple implant options | Subglandular or submuscular placement, different incision options | Listed in Harper’s Bazaar and Town and Country as top breast plastic surgeon |
| Mount Sinai Plastic Surgeons | Use of 3D imaging technology, offering silicone, saline, and fat transfer options | Multiple implant placement and incision techniques | Extensive experience in breast augmentation |
| Dr. Rapaport | Offering Ideal Implant, in - depth consultation process with advanced imaging | Endoscope underarm approach for Ideal Implant | One of 250 doctors nationwide offering Ideal Implant |
| Dr. John E. Sherman | Deep understanding of breast implants, guiding patients through implant selection | Subglandular or submuscular placement, inframammary, periareolar, or transaxillary incisions | Involved in development of Natrelle 410 cohesive gel breast implants |
Conclusion
In conclusion, evaluating ES breast augmentation prosthesis in New York City involves considering multiple factors, including safety, aesthetic results, patient comfort, long - term durability, and compatibility with different techniques. The top plastic surgeons in the city, such as Dr. Adam R. Kolker, Dr. Darrick Antell, Mount Sinai Plastic Surgeons, Dr. Rapaport, and Dr. John E. Sherman, each bring their unique expertise and approaches to breast augmentation.
Patients considering ES breast augmentation should thoroughly research these surgeons, understand the different techniques and prostheses available, and have in - depth consultations with their chosen surgeon. By doing so, they can make an informed decision that aligns with their goals and ensures a successful breast augmentation procedure.
If you're interested in learning more about ES breast augmentation or scheduling a consultation with a plastic surgeon in New York City, reach out to the surgeons mentioned in this article or continue your research online. Take the first step towards achieving your desired aesthetic results today!
